International Study Group on the Relations Between

HISTORY and PEDAGOGY of MATHEMATICS NEWSLETTER


An Affiliate of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction: No. 44, November 2000

History and Culture in Mathematics Education

Report of Working Group for Action 13

Structure and themes

The Working Group concentrated on the following five major themes, which were identified in the call for papers. For each theme a keynote speaker was invited. The keynote lectures were discussed in subgroups, in which further short presentations were given as well.

Further presentations and discussion

After the keynote lectures further work was done in three subgroups.

The first group was chaired by Costas Tzanakis (University of Crete, Greece) and went on with the theme of multidisciplinary work. The discussion explored what multidisciplinary work might be in the context of mathematics education. The conclusion was that there should be an emphasis on mathematics, and that the teacher should adjust the work to the social context of the students. Important parameters are the educational level of the students, the subject, the time available, and the teacherís own experience. Multidisciplinary work is possible in practically any subject. Examples signalled were: calculus, differential equations, probability theory and statistics, combinatorics, vector analysis and functional analysis, but also subjects like number theory, group theory and topology. The subjects may relate to non-mathematical topics such as: physics and natural sciences, philosophy, music and arts, logic and linguistics, drama, literature and history.

Specific examples of actual implementations were presented by Oscar Joao Abdounur (Brazil), about Historical aspects of ratio and proportion in music and mathematics education; Costas Tzanakis, about Elaborating on abstract algebraic concepts on the basis of physical ideas and concepts: special relativity on the basis of elementary matrix algebra and group theory and Paul Manning (USA) on Intersections of mathematics and the humanities discovered by accident: language, literature, philosophy.

A second group, chaired by Karen Michalowicz, went on with the themes Effectiveness of history in teaching mathematics and Probability theory and statistics. Short presentations were given by Catherin Murphy (USA), about A historical course for teachers; Rebecca Kessler (USA), about A module about Archimedes for the mathematics classroom; Osamu Takenouchi (Japan), about History and mathematics teaching in Japan; Phyllis Caruth (USA), about A module about the history of combinatorics and statistics for the mathematics classroom, and Bernd Zimmermann (Germany) about Appealing geometrical problems from Al-Sizji. The subsequent discussion was mainly about effectiveness. The conclusion was that there are many ways to implement history, some of them needing special attention and care. For example, one should be critical when students use information that comes from the Internet. History can have a function, it was agreed, either to enrich mathematics (e.g. if you know a subject already, to do it once more but in a different manner), or to introduce a subject to students. It can be applied in order to develop a new learning trajectory; it can produce heuristics for problem solving, and many more useful things. Historical games were also discussed as a positive contribution in mathematics lessons.

The third group, chaired by Florence Fasanelli (Washington DC, USA) and Jan van Maanen, worked on the broader cultural perspective, as reflected by the final two keynote lectures. Short presentations were by Lawrence Shirley (USA) about Using costumes and connecting to local peculiarities and Man-Keung Siu (Hong Kong) about his course Mathematics: a cultural heritage. A variety of aspects of culture came up for discussion:


Looking back on this Working Group some general conclusions may be drawn. The first is that the relation between history and mathematics education is still an area in which many developments take place. The systematic production and testing of historical modules, as described by Michalowicz and Katz, is one example of a type of research with a practical outcome that is very important. The value of making a connection with local culture was brought forward more than once, and with reports of positive results. Increasing confidence with students is one of the key-words connected with the positive evaluation.

As always, positive results require input. The balance between cost and result was discussed, and although it was agreed that the costs are still high, many participants appeared willing to invest in this manner. One of the reasons was their own pleasure in preparing historical material for students, but the main reason was that they noticed many positive effects with students. In some countries the curriculum is not supportive of this work. Further work has to be done on national levels.

More history at ICME-9

As an appendix I shall list here the other historical activities at ICME-9.
There were regular lectures by Niels Jahnke (Germany) about Historical sources in the mathematics classroom: ideas and experiences, by Osamu Takenouchi (Japan) about Some characteristic features of Wasan, the Japanese traditional mathematics and by Ewa Lakoma (Poland) about History of mathematics in educational research and mathematics teaching ó a case of probability and statistics.

Then there were two sessions of the International Study Group on the relations between History and Pedagogy of Mathematics (HPM), with the following speakers: Bjørn Smestad (Norway) on History of mathematics in Norwegian textbooks, Peter Ransom (UK) on Teaching geometry through the use of old instruments, Osamu Kota (Japan) on John Perry and mathematics education in Japan, Yoichi Hirano, Katsihusa Kawamura and Shin Watanabe (Japan) on Mathematical exhibits at museums from viewpoints of mathematics education, Nobuki Watanabe (Japan) on A practice of the cultural history of mathematics in elementary school. The second HPM-session was concluded by the installation of HPMís new chair for the period 2000-2004, Fulvia Furinghetti (University of Genova, Italy).

And finally, the book History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study, edited by John Fauvel and Jan van Maanen, and published by Kluwer Academic Publishes (Dordrecht 2000), was launched with presentations by several chapter-coordinators (Fasanelli, Jahnke, Michalowicz, Nagaoka, Siu and Tzanakis).

Jan van Maanen (University of Groningen, Netherlands)


Return home.


Web design by Dr. Katie Ambruso. and maintained by Andrew K